If one deal doesn't work out, another deal makes up for it.

Took a lot of the guess work out of it and we did well.

If you buy three things and work the same hardness on all of them, two work out and one is a loss you've worked three times as hard to get one win.

I hope things work out for you Zach.

That one did not work out. 

That is if you're going to farm that work out.  

He made workouts with the banks to handle it so he didn't lose anything but his credit was damaged.

And no... attorneys can bill hourly (out of your pocket) or agree to take a case on contingency (from the winnings) or work out a combination of those.

I'm starting to find this thread entertaining with the arguments that a Listing Broker vetting an unrepped buyer is seen as establishing an Agency Relationship.I like to do something called "Thought Experiments" which can at least help me to understand scenarios that are similar and may help work out the complexity.Scenario #1 - FSBO vets BuyersIf a FSBO vets Buyers, does this establishes a implied Agency relationship?!

Agreed mate,43606 is mostly rough and 43610 and 43620 is hit/miss.Put In Bay has a total of 7 houses hahaBowling Green quite expensive and only 1 target tenant and they are students...Online stats/demographics are one thing, real life and on-ground experience is another.As an investor you are limited if your decisions are based on solely online research.Had an investor that bought 6 properties from us ages ago and was using some weird online algorithm and plugging every deal I sent him through RentFax (I easily send 30 or so deals for consideration).I advised against this strategy but it is what it is.Didn't work out for him unfortunately and he decided to sell.Maybe I should get him to post a thread and throw us under the bus.It's always our fault, right?