They’re asset-based, meaning the loan is secured by the property itself, and they often have quicker approval times but higher interest rates (think 10–15%) and fees.

A few other methods cost some money but is usually just throwing away small amounts at a time. 

What I love about them is they will even accept the higher lease amounts over the market rents if we can show first month's rent and security deposit.

So instead they throw away there $$$ on program after program, guru after guru, trying to find a way around the things that there is no way around; Time, Energy and Focus.What is a STR? 

Security investigated to find the renters still at our house.

When I started, I  submitted great deals to a corporate cash buyer,  they went behind my back and secure the deals with the sellers, after the  contracts expired.

I recommend smaller unit count LL use a higher number because they do not have a crew to throw at the tenant turnover.  

If you throw away 30 linens per year without getting reimbursed, it is $1,000.

If ODC cannot execute on their funds and are falling well short of performance expectations, then I'm not sure how any potential investor would feel secure in this new 'private credit fund'. 

Which one is more appealing - continuing to own the house or the security of that much cash/liquidity?