Therefore, no confrontations :)

I would just be upfront and I would confront the seller and ask him what's going on, if it's really good dealClose on it yourself, just ask seller to close this week. 

Well, you made me Google...Q From Peter J Lusby: A question arose recently during a discussion here in California about the origin of the expression argy-bargy (also written argey-bargey), meaning a relatively amicable, if somewhat heated, argument.I hope I haven't scared you off or seem confrontational.

I’m confident that if they start saving now as well as increase their networking web to further job success, they’ll be properly equipped to tackle the issues confronting them.

So feel free to confront them when they are out of line.

If its in a C or D area, and you mess with peoples dogs, they will confront you physically and it could be very dangerous. 

However, I caution anyone willing to place significant bets that Obama's "stimulus" plan will reverse the current recession tide any time soon, to simply examine the largess of issues confronting our economy.

Also, when confronting attorneys with this type of closing, do I just be upfront and ask him if he does simultanous closings?

Any good litigation attorney will be able to uncover who you are if they want to sue for big $, so the only 'benefit' to shielding your identity is having less confrontations, which in my opinion is unnecessary if you run your business properly.

So the process server I hired to serve the Summons/Complaint/Prejudgment Claim of Right to Possession indicated she tried 2 times last week and 1 time this week and each time she was confronted by an entire family in the SFD being vacated, who somehow moved in and would not give their names but informed that they do not know the named Defendant =LProcess server is mailing the proof of service into court (Los Angeles) but I am now wondering how does that work since per LA and OC websites' wording, that they expect even the Claim of Right to Possession be delivered (whether direct or substituted) to a named defendant?!