FHA has no guidelines specifically providing conditions where Bitcoin could be recognized as an acceptable source for funds to close.The way I read this, Coinbase (or the chosen cryptocurrency clearing house) would need to fully comply with every single thing that Bank of America and Fidelity does to verify your identity, and then issue regular normal vanilla bank statements (if you have to use the word "but..." to argue for how the thing is a bank statement, it's probably not a bank statement), which they currently do not (hours spent on customer service, clicking around my account & the borrower's account, etc etc). 

But if I were you I would be making a immediate bee line back to the property (xmas or not) to figure what the heck happened and quickly make an assessment to get the property back in condition. 

To be fair, they sold me the home, so as long as it ends up in the rentable condition noted in the purchase agreement, I see no responsibility on their part to stick around for another 2-3 years.

However, its subscription costs can add up, and the effectiveness of direct mail depends on execution and market conditions.

In California, a tenant is considered an “at will” tenant if ALL of the following conditions are met: (a) the individual occupies a property, or room within the property, with the owner, (b) there is no agreement for the occupancy to be for a specified period of time; AND (c) the individual occupying the property is not paying, and never has paid, any rent.

With market conditions as they are I don't want to be too restrictive.  

Same as Isha here...would love to hear how things are going in light of the new market conditions.  

Remember syndicators run a business, and they invest in almost all market conditions.

Document the condition they left it, keep receipts for the charges, and charge it to their card.

The places are kept clean and In perfect condition.