It provided a short term life line to households who would have been homeless otherwise, but it didn’t solve the problem of American households being financially burdened.

The location will only stay economically viable if new companies are moving into the location, creating new jobs requiring similar skills and paying a similar wage.The best way I know to quickly assess the economic health of a location is median household income.

The prices of homes in general here is way out of my household's budget so I am looking to start out by buying something out of state (eyeing out Austin, TX but open to other locations).

To determine whether I thought a market condition was a bubble or not, I would be primarily focusing on job growth, wage growth, business migration, economic diversity, and household levels of debt.

And exactly what is "loathing of the immigrant", please do tell, speaking as a immigrant household, we are curious.

Found in https://www.theepochtimes.com/...A recent report from Apartment Guide found that households need an annual income of at least $254,000 to rent an average apartment in New York City and $188,000 for a rental in Boston.Rounding out the top five expensive U.S. cities for rentals are Oakland, California, with income requirements of over $177,000, followed by San Francisco at $173,400 and Los Angeles at $158,000.

(e) Functions of SecretaryThe Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall--(1) make studies with respect to the nature and extent of discriminatory housing practices in representative communities, urban, suburban, and rural, throughout the United States;(2) publish and disseminate reports, recommendations, and information derived from such studies, including an annual report to the Congress--(A) specifying the nature and extent of progress made nationally in eliminating discriminatory housing practices and furthering the purposes of this title, obstacles remaining to achieving equal housing opportunity, and recommendations for further legislative or executive action; and(B) containing tabulations of the number of instances (and the reasons therefor) in the preceding year in which--(i) investigations are not completed as required by section 810(a)(1)(B);(ii) determinations are not made within the time specified in section 810(g); and(iii) hearings are not commenced or findings and conclusions are not made as required by section 812(g);(3) cooperate with and render technical assistance to Federal, State, local, and other public or private agencies, organizations, and institutions which are formulating or carrying on programs to prevent or eliminate discriminatory housing practices;(4) cooperate with and render such technical and other assistance to the Community Relations Service as may be appropriate to further its activities in preventing or eliminating discriminatory housing practices;(5) administer the programs and activities relating to housing and urban development in a manner affirmatively to further the policies of this subchapter; and(6) annually report to the Congress, and make available to the public, data on the race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, and family characteristics of persons and households who are applicants for, participants in, or beneficiaries or potential beneficiaries of, programs administered by the Department to the extent such characteristics are within the coverage of the provisions of law and Executive orders referred to in subsection (f) which apply to such programs (and in order to develop the data to be included and made available to the public under this subsection, the Secretary shall, without regard to any other provision of law, collect such information relating to those characteristics as the Secretary determines to be necessary or appropriate).

By crafting a bill this incredibly vague with little to no explanation as to how or who will decide what costs are “necessary to maintain the dwelling unit” or “substantially likely to force a tenant household to move or involuntarily relocate”, you have guaranteed ample employment opportunities for attorneys to argue both for and against this.

This type of cracking is more prevalent with large folks in the household, vs. the more petite.

Average household income has only increased 16% in the last 30 years.  16 percent!