IMHO it's the investors with the LONG TERM view always in mind that will succeed and not panic or change their LONG TERM strategy to adjust for hypothetical market movements. 

I am with @Anthony Wick on not initiating anything.My other tenants are all teleworking.I am growing concerned about the spill off from this "cancel rent" movement and I am extraordinarily surprised that leaders and economists are not speaking out about it.

I don't see much movement over the past three decades or more.

For us we do not need to sell them as they are cash flowing, and sellers are in this position whereas buyers are sitting on cash doing nothing - so its either buy it at 10-12% or let it sit and collect nothing hoping things change - but on the lower upb market, I do not see much movement in that market even when things start to open up.

That's what happens in markets with high demand and perpetually limited supply; it is the nature of the beast.

With Rutland especially I have been worried about the tenants being not the most desirable due to the city having a lot of drug movement.

Personally I hope I can keep my prime properties in perpetuity, but I realize that at some point I may need to sell them off.

So after investor’s principal is paid back all cash flows would be distributed 50/50 in perpetuity or until the property is sold?

I am honored and very excited to be a part of such an amazing movement in the real estate industry.  

A lot of what creeps in as far as no-nos is perpetuated by lenders with overlays.