If newbies have some whizbang guru scheme to spin off a few dollars on a pre- or FC property, stay away, far away, as far as you can possibly get away.These matters have been up before here, a few whizbangs argued they knew what they were doing or what they did wasn't going to be in violation, whatever their financial interest was in promoting this stuff, they were not lawyers and the had no clue as to the breadth or depth of the ramifications of their actions, much less the risks involved.Another side, as to the issues mentioned above, any other party to that transaction, agent, title folks, bank, attorney, or even the seller's 3rd cousin who came over for dinner may very well see you as some scam artist and get on the phone getting who knows what authority involved.

The only thing I didn't care for was the color schemes.

I’d venture that many are not looking for a “get rich quick scheme” but in my opinion, are just seeking to learn “how”?

How many end up convicted of Ponzi schemes or other scams?

Financing is only one negotiating point in the grand scheme of a real estate transaction. 

I see accusations of some type of fraud, and the inability to enforce this scheme at some point in the future, IF you were able to slip this by in the closing.  

When taking into account each house individually, $72.50 per month at 10% for repairs isn't too much in the grand scheme of things.  

I have a vast understanding of everything decor and can provide story boards, color schemes, design ideas, DIY decor advice, etc.

However, the language in Section 199A itself seems to disallow that; my interpretation is that it requires each activity to be evaluated independently unless the activities can qualify for aggregation under a new scheme in Section 199A. 

Unfortunately the pump and dump advance schemes are a live and well right now.. again not saying you don't actually close stuff..