It is effective Aug. 1, 2024.This ordinance is referred to as the Source of Income Discrimination Ban Ordinance" - which is identified in File #231019 and amends sections of Chapter 38 (Civil Rights) and Chapter 34 (Health and Sanitation) in the Missouri Revised Statutes for the purpose of classifying source of income as a protected trait in regard to housing discrimination.Here are some key takeaways from the attached ordinance:This ordinance bans discrimination against tenants based solely on:Source of income from an occupation, including gig work or paying rent in cash Use of public programs like Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, disability checks, or social security Poor credit score Prior evictions and alleged damages older than 12 months (less than 12 months can be a basis for denial) Prior convictions or arrests (sexual and violent crimes are excepted, a landlord can still deny based on these convictions)The ordinance also requires the city to proactively scan for rental ads using discriminatory language like "no Section 8" or "no past evictions".Landlords who are found to be in violation of the ordinance with respect to source of income can be fined up to $1,000 per incident.

I believe one of the syndications I am an LP is doing poorly but the GPs have not yet admitted as much publicly.  

Instead of explaining that they haven't planned the work out to that level of detail yet and getting back to you with answers they don't want to admit they can't answer on the spot and respond with frustration because they don't know how to handle the situation and are emotionally immature.

If the police reports will not verify drug activity, you will have a longer path to eviction.Let's say the reports verify your allegation of drug activity. 

I think you may have trouble getting a lender to admit that the property can be both an investment property (for your parents) and a primary residence for yourself.I think it would be much more likely that a lender would give you and your parents an investment grade loan. 

The 4th asset was allegedly still being sold and was supposed to close by the end of the week at which point he would wire me the money.

@Blaison Samuel No, but a simple Google search reveals someone who has bought a ton of domains, all with the keywords "J T Foxx complaints and J T Foxx lawsuits" ......possibly an attempt to bury any criticism of the fact that there was a lawsuit alleging sexual harassment of a minor, or comlpaints of him charging up to $60,000 for whatever it is he does.http://www.bizjournals.com/prnewswire/press_releases/2012/08/24/LA62361Does that help?

Cut your losses admittedly I dont know your market so ..... 

If they can't or won't meet that test (for any alleged reason), then no point in doing business. 

I admit I was getting cocky and starting to think I would never significantly bust a rehab budget.