Would it be better to sell, or hold onto it as a rental and reap the benefits of prop 13 in perpetuity?

Never invested because he grew up with me in Brooklyn, prior to the Gentrification movement.

Also the caliber of tenant I have in at least one property (it could be the part of town I'm in - Hammond, Hobart, Laporte, IN) is perpetually VERY VERY late with rent.   

It's now under contract and we have just gone through the comprehensive inspection which found signs of foundation movement.

There is also some interesting information on money movement. 

I am personally very interested in his progress and forward movement especially if it is directly related to Peter and Joe's coaching program which charges a 15K "are you serious" fee PLUS an extra 1K a month on marketing.

So, the bottom line is: are you willing to take a property that is underperforming, at an “inflated” cap rate (based on current rents) in order to create half a million dollars over the next year ... and you get $2500+/mo in perpetuity as it continues to grow in value! 

And the loan exists in perpetuity (so-to-speak).Conversely, I also have a portfolio loan line-of-credit in place (mine is a commercial loan variant).

I'm looking to purchase a quadplex (house hack) and the numbers seem to make sense.The issue or concern I'm having is, several years ago (approx 7) there was grown movement , (possible sinkhole) but current owners sued insurance after patchy work.

This allows you and your investors the opportunity to maximize return on property movement, defer taxes completely with 1031 exchanges, and pay capital gains rates rather than ordinary income rates on those you don't 1031.