Wholesalers have no intention of purchasing the property.

Their intention was to take possession of the property by end of this week.

Additionally you have to be ok with not disclosing your true intentions as for the use of the information.

Why he is so intent on bashing me, not sure. 

As our portfolio grew, we were intentional about keeping our profile personal rather than corporate.

I’m just trying to figure out what the extra $130 is for and they won’t tell me.Is this still a case of the property owner not doing their due diligence or is it perhaps an intentional attempt to mask egregious fees on the part of an unethical PMC?

I purchased a property in an area with an HOA in 2020 in a ski town with the intent to build a home on it to live in during retirement (15 years away) and rent until then using it occasionally when not rented to cover the mortgage.

Now onto the real estate...If you truly want to protect yourself against STR regulations only purchase property with the intent of  operating as an STR where these three principles apply: (1) the use is allowed, (2) the use requirements are protected by in place permitting and licensing and (3) the permissions are transferable through a sale.

If your intent/interest is not in buy and hold and you find a better use for the funds by selling then explore that option.

I feel the ROE needs to be redeployed but with intention.