They have access to your county court house documents where you are encouraged to send out 200 letters a week to the leads you are given.

If they didn't give you this they broke the law and you could take them to court if that's your thing.

You can not rely on rental income to help you qualify on a 2nd home transaction, and you can put as little as 10% down on a 2nd home.As for the 2nd part of your question: "Cash offer on distressed home in the Winter, rehab etc" - if you're paying cash, there isn't a loan, so you don't need to declare/specify occupancy when paying cash.

Lastly, while looking through the County Court Record I found a dismissed Eviction record filed this year Feb of 2024 on the prospect, the address listed on the record for the prospect (Defendant) is the current property they reside in but found another management company (RENU Property Management) as the plaintiff (this one was easier to look up as it operates nationally in several states).I usually have no problem with this as prospects usually reside in a known management company serviced in the area (Most are the typical corporate rental companies like First Key and Progress Residential, and some with the more known local management companies.).

Should I take this to small claims court?

I will also be taking the contractor to court soon as well for damages.

This is also why two parties go to court or arbitration, they differ in their interpretation of typically very clear language in the contract and one or the other doesn’t want to honor it.

Most courts have found for the creditor in obtaining full ownership of the debtors interest in LLCs, Corporations, and Limited Partnerships.  

Just this week I sent an e-mail to her caseworker to notify the HA of our pending lawsuit to obtain a judgment for what she owns, and the caseworker confirmed that she will place the voucher on hold until the outcome of the court case, which prohibits the tenant from leaving until I confirm she is in compliance with her lease. 

Similar to a broker’s opinion of value, this analysis is less detailed and may not follow USPAP guidelines.Replacement cost method: This methodology is supported by a 1982 tax court case, Meiers v Commissioner (T.C.