First do you understand the meaning of a score and understand how to interpret a credit report.

Because they think it is a static series of rules to which there is only one right interpretation.

The CARES Act’s eviction protections only apply to “covered dwellings,” which are rental units inproperties: (1) that participate in federal assistance programs, (2) are subject to a “federally backedmortgage loan,” or (3) are subject to a “federally backed multifamily mortgage loan.”Link here.I interpret this to mean that if you own your rental property free and clear, your property is not covered by CARES Act.

It's interesting that your interpretation is that I "bashed" him. 

I interpret this as meaning, in practice, that the state will not allow a tax deed to extinguish a bank mortgage.

Just because a Lawyer interprets the code one way the state could take a completely different view.. 

It cannot be interpreted as "now I can deduct everything."

It isn't the same as the liability containment of an LLP, but does reduce risk, and in my opinion the double taxation issue now rules out use of limited liability partnerships for Canadians investing in the US.I would be happy to hear others' opinions and interpretations of the tax rules.  

As I interpret the code, even if I own a dozen residential properties, as long as the subject property is my primary residence, I may submit a claim against the home builder guaranty fund for defects that have not been corrected by the home builder, or covered by a new home warranty policy.  

The underwriters do a lot of interpretation because they’re not walking through the property.