Some Governing docs can be very difficult to interpret.

On top of code there is also case law interpretation and continuous changes, so this area is better left to experts.

"Broom clean' is not mentioned in law and it is widely open to interpretation.  

The way I read the law is you can mail it to them, but some judges interpret differently so nice to have all 3. 

If you interpret the heading as a stereotype of the Louisville market, well, that's your take.

I'm in a similar situation and had a similar interpretation, but I'm having trouble finding resources on this...

He didn't do it and when the buyer confronted him right after closing, he said he wasn't going to do it, never intended to do it and the contract stipulates he never had to after offering his own interpretation on what "replace" means, which clearly in his mind does not imply actually relocating the fridge.

Here, your situation would fall into a grey area: Under Residential Tenancies Act the landlord cannot require rent payment in advance of the next period, but - pending interpretation - a landlord is not forbidden from accepting prepayment if offered.

I will post the outcome but it may take several weeks if not months.We learned the rules around 'reasonable modification' requests from tenants with disabilities is vaguely defined and open for wide interpretation. 

It comes down to interpretation.