ahh, movement from the bank - closing just 14 days late :) I'll take it. 

Because in most markets where people expect great appreciation (or depreciation) in real estate values, there is inherent volatility in that market for the precisely the same reasons as anticipated price movements. 

My partner and I learned a lot about the Financial Independence movement in the last two years and have been saving everything we can and living as inexpensively as we can to help save up money for our first investment property.

But let's say Cash is the motivation...then you have to make the case that the property won't likely be sold on the retail market with a tenant in it...so he would have to remove the tenant, spruce up and repair the place, possibly stage it for sale, hire an agent, pay a commission, wait to see what the market does as far as buyer interest, be willing to drop their price if no movement in 30days, play the Buyer mortgage process of WDO Inspection, home inspections, appraisal report and rely on the Buyer that they can close.

It is in their vested interest to perpetuate the status quo.

Seems like there must be some movement out there to try to call investors vultures and mandate that they do this or that in regard to homeowner rights.

If the bricks are bowing out away from the house, the movement can be arrested with star bolts.

Do I go for the quick cash or the potential perpetual income?

Sort of a "hooray for me and to hell with you" movement - even with multiple protests and several votes of residents to defeat the new train.Not that it's especially relevant, but the stories of corruption on the build and management of the contract are legendary.  

A few things you might consider:- Upside: Tech movement into the area, new developments (check out urbanize LA)- Economics: Average entry price per door, rent to value- Other Boundaries: Rent control, crime-heavy neighborhoodsCheers,Armand