(5 tenants are original tenants, having been in the homes since I purchased them 9-12 years ago when I was doing more buying.)My last purchase was a 1031 exchange in September of 23 for a new build. 

Originally posted by @Lodewijk Hof:Hello,I'm doing my research on Australia real estate market. ll use the data for a brochure, which is part of my strategy to increase investor awareness.I'm wondering if you can help me on the following data:1.

Can I leave them off of the original purchase since they are gifting me the money (6 figures) or do they need to be on the original deed and then when I get the mortgage remove them?

While the offer sounds tempting, I want to ensure I capitalize on these contracts fairly and effectively.Here are my main questions:Should I entertain the idea of terminating my current contracts, or is it better to stick to my original wholesale plan?

This is pushing many to look at areas that still offer strong cash flow backed by solid economic factors.I’m originally from Florida, but experienced the same issue after factoring in all the expenses.

Now, with me being back I'm returning to my original plan of wanting to house hack in the Greater Boston Area.

An original purchase loan was taken in 1998, which was refinanced in 2004, and then again in 2005.

.• Reporting companies created/registered on or after December 3, 2024 and on or before December 23, 2024, have an additional 21 days from their original filing deadline to file their initial BOI reports FinCEN.• Reporting companies that qualify for disaster relief may have extended deadlines that fall beyond January 13, 2025.

But, did you know that your beautiful country of origin Mexico also has plenty of exciting real estate investment opportunities?

Surplus line is what I have been looking for as I am involved with an older property that is typically found to be uninsurable by a lot of other mainstream insurance companies due to the properties age and some of its original features and surroundings, I just have a question and have done some reading on this and it's really not too clear and it sounds it can go either way really with this and I'm fairly new to all this so I am learning a lot of things as I go but should the private non traditional mortgage lender be listed as additional insured while the person occupying & buying the home and also purchasing the property from the lender be listed as mortgagee?