I might take the highest dollar amounts available that would not result in an absurd number of cards and just get a total on purchase of 3-5%, or so, off. 

., 78 T.C. 234).An investor buys with the intent to hold for appreciation and/or rental income.As to your absurd attempt to compare wholesaling real estate to "dabbling" in the stock market my response would be that the teacher is not buying the stock to sell to another investor for a profit.

As I mentioned earlier, I've had to defend the property before various authorities against false discrimination allegations, it did not cost the tenant anything but it cost the company money to hire lawyers and defend the property.

This knowledge gap has made text marketing one of the hottest areas of TCPA litigation, which has seen an unprecedented explosion since 2015.Can you point me to something indicating this is false? 

it's just gone sour. plus they're asking me to fix something that is just an absurd request that i cannot fulfill. they claim they've been injured. it's a long story.

That is false...but a common misunderstanding.

If the market interest rates is going absurdly high and you typically need a 7% return on investment, then maybe you need to drop to 5%.

(That was and remains completely false.)

Do you expect a tenant to give you a false identity and would you be OK with that?

People use them to paydown credit card debt then run up the debt again, that is where we will start to see some defaults.I would also not recommend anyone be bullish on residential, while i do not see it crashing, I do not see the increases we saw past few years, it was a false sense due to the amount of money put into the system and only $300B of like $8T has been removed.