I hope that provides some relief in the years ahead. 

And, these matters generally won't arise from some auditor or regulator seeing a deal that closed with unrealistic prices or terms, they generally come up after the fact by interested parties and they sue seeking relief or justice  of tortuous conduct.

“It is extremely important for everyone involved in the seller finance industry, from the small business owner to the potential homeowner whose only path to homeownership is through seller financing, that we all join together to make a concerted effort to achieve regulatory relief from the burdens, a lot of them as a result of unintended consequences, from Dodd-Frank and CFPB legislation.

It has been a bit stressful, and I don't want to rush to buy just to get some relief.

Upon the determination of the court that the vendor has failed to comply with these provisions, the court shall grant appropriate relief.

If you knew about it and allowed it, then have your manager start proper procedures for eviction immediately, take it as an expensive lesson and hope you get some relief in court, however unlikely.   

Having dealt with several estates on the selling end, it is sometimes a relief to get a solicitation "out of the blue".  

That was helpful and somewhat a relief that ($4500 is not much for typical roof).  

Thus is not the deal to cut your teeth on and it is unlikely that the bank will agree to a short sale with a deployed veteran owner due to protections for Active Duty accorded through the Soldier and Sailors Relief Act.  

That's gotta be a relief.