Find Brandon's videos on YouTube for the "four square" method of analyzing homes and practice.

I think their general stance is going to be to go with whichever comparable property has the greatest degree of similarity in terms of (probably, in this order): location, age built, quality of construction/current condition, and square footage.

I wouldn't worry about the square footage all that much because it's not always correct.

They are in Fountain Square, Crooked Creek, and Forest Manor/Audubon Gardens.I normally see expense ratios sitting around 40-50% for SFH's, is this accurate for this area? 

I have a 2800 square ft four-plex currently under contract.Thanks in advance! 

My take on this discussion is this:Anyone can take whatever time and effort they want to argue that it doesn't / can't work (it does / can), or you can just do it and enjoy the benefits.It's not applicable to every situation - stop trying to force this square peg into a round hole.There's no "secrets", no "magic" to it.It's meant for situations where the way it works can help someone achieve their financial goals. 

•What’s the square footage?

Help them get a family squared away quickly by answering all incoming emails and phones calls as soon as possible.

In most cases the existing footings on post-war homes build around Tampa Bay are strong enough to build on top of.

Originally posted by @Drew Sygit:You might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”, since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant: https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesdon't know the situation but a lot of what i see is round peg in square hole..