It's patently false.2.

We've got a patent pending method to deal with it but even then it's not fool proof :(

I hate to even type this out, because it is so patently unfair, but the law is the law.But when you go into the courtroom, take your proof of damage, and be prepared to make your case.  

I really can't do anything to the unit, until they move out, and that does provide some challenges, but in my mind a small price to pay to move on, and have a chance to start working on the property.The issue is this...My PM thinks the tenant is completely lying (they definitely has made some statements to me that are patently untrue so I do know they are manipulative) or that it's likely the sale will not go through.

(And just so I don't feel left out - my friend is a really good patent attorney, but I never go to him for information on ESAs.)This topic has been debated ad nauseum (for you people without lawyer friends, you'll have to look it up) here on BP and @Andrew B. is correct. 

I remember being disgusted that my patents, if they were to follow the 30 year mortgage at. 13% , would pay I think it was 100000 for a 45000 home.

You are violating my business method patent on this weird trick.

Although practicing law is my day time job, my real passion lies in real estate.  Even though I've acquired a couple of investment properties in the DFW area (3 to be exact) over the last couple of years, I still cons...

Although, the wholesaler inspected the property in person twice, once before making the offer and once right before closing; whereas most Roofstock investors don’t get a chance to walk the properties before closing.I’d also like to point out that Roofstock recently launched this patent-pending new platform called “Roofstock One” that allows investors to invest in SFR more passively outside of direct ownership.

Patents would function this way for many companies, I believe.Regarding economic moats, I think that's more challenging in real estate.