Yes there is the SCRA but also understand that many states also enact additional legislation for active duty military families regarding relief during deployment and PCS (permanent change of station) .

To keep legislators from intervening; to prevent legislation investors will find undesirable.With so many people out there "doing it wrong" and "learning from their mistakes", a point is reached where legislators must step in to protect those who are being hurt: lenders and other money investors as well as tenants and property owners / buyers.Want to curb further tenant-friendly ordinances and other legislation which hurts investors? 

The Bankruptcy court analyzed the Alaska statute and found that there was very clear legislative intent by the Alaska legislature and that indeed the purpose of the statute was to seize all control of the determination of transfers.

But there is a currently a piece of legislation making progress that I've read would require cities/counties to have an amnesty program for units built before the ADU rules were passed (and many municipalities already have this in place).

How the legislation and regulations are written and interpreted will be a big factor in whether it is worth your while to accept pets.Here in NB, we are allowed to discriminate and not allow pets, but other jurisdictions (ON) that appears to no longer be the case.    

“You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

The specific piece of legislation.

It has investor friendly legislation, stable rent rates, and affordability, but like everywhere else, the good opportunities are slowing down.

There are plenty of other legislated impediments.

I'm on the rental services commission and I'm frequently going back to review new legislation to ensure we're doing things correctly.