Does anyone know of any other ways to gauge the effectiveness of this plan? 

Should I make an offer with the qualification that all furnishings, dishes, pots, and pans stay, except for "personal" effects?

You don’t need a judgement, but not sure how effective it would be:   https://www.rentrecoveryservic...

https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/93/topics/1224328-new-l...here is a thread I just did on Oregons new law that takes effect July 1 2025.

Prior to last year, effectively any SFR was eligible for a short term rental license.

If you pay cash, you don't have a payment, but effectively you are giving up an income stream if the cash had been in a bond or ETF and earning you either interest or appreciation. 

However, this is not really effective in the real world.

However, the most effective method is to simply tell the tenant that they'll need to provide proof of insurance prior to or on the day 1 of the start of the lease, otherwise the keys will not be provided to them.

Given the cash flow loss on the 7% property, I think I need to remove the emotion and make the right business decision for my portfolio holistically.

If you do the math, since your borrower is paying interest on interest, it raises your effective interest rate by about a point.