Originally posted by @Justin Windham:@David BurtonWelcome to Bigger Pockets!

We regularly take over properties from managers who haven’t performed well, and it’s a seamless process when done right.

If you're not meeting the 500 test, you will need to track the time of each person that performs work on the property. 

Out of curiosity, how did you originally finance the properties if they are negatively cash flowing?

Originally posted by @Mike Lambert:@Jon Latorre$100k+ sounds nice but it's not the same return whether the property costs $2 million or $5 million.My question was what is the typical rental yield range?

However, if long-term stability is the priority, sticking with the original financing approach might be the better move.

Quote from @Emily Gowen: I only recommend investors sell when they can move the money to a better-performing investment or when the sale moves them closer to a specific goal.

My family and I are originally from Cuba.

Originally posted by @Ethan Cooke:@Nick Kraska - It really depends on how much you want to get involved in building a team/network, minor maintenance while you're there, etc.

This is a straightforward process that we’ve followed to consistently deliver high-performance properties, and it does not require secrets or gurus.