I agree that there’s a fine line between aggressive but legal vs. reckless and punishable.I saw this gem from Will Rogers:  “The income tax has made more liars out of the American people than golf has.”

That's totally fine..

I use a pm right now for what I have in Metro-Detroit and they do a fine job. 

Either of which are fine with me.

You can easily report them to the regulators if they do something fraudulent and can pay fines and/or have their license revoked. 

couple of bullet points to bring up:* she's on M2M* I told her on 12/7 of the new rent which would apply to a new Jan. 1 effective lease, this is when I got the "I'm moving out" message* Sent her the move-out letter on 12/11, with options for her to either be moved out by 12/31 (she's fully paid up for month of December) or by 1/11 (30 days from date of notice) and pay a pro-rated rent based on her CURRENT rent amount. her choice, either is fine with me.With all that said, I'd love to do as you mentioned and post a notice on her door. 

Your current RE seems like a fine asset that I would not consider selling to enter most other markets.  

That's fine, but they have to know there's a tradeoff for everything.

Here's a link to the data: https://mred.stats.10kresearch.com/infoserv/s-v1/vwxv-Zs5What this data shows at a Macro level is that the Chicago market is doing fine, but the market is too large to use that data to make any decisions about where you want to house hack.

They're fine for buying a turnkey, older home that gets "spruced up" and comes with a 1-year warranty on their repairs.