The Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) prohibits harassment and discrimination in employment because of race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, mental and physical disability, medical condition, age, pregnancy, denial of ... www.dfeh.ca.gov/Publications_FEHADescr.htm Even though the above definition does not specifically state this applies to housing the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing brochure below says as much. http://www.dfeh.ca.gov/res/docs/Publications/DFEH-157H.pdf And yes I agree - bad information is worse than no information.

What would happen if that person were a criminal or worse some type of sexual preditor  and this homeowners wife was home alone  this is why Open houses the female RE agents holding them must really be aware of their surroundings

Sexual predator map?

This is what is on page 1 of the application:Our Criteria:We do not deny housing for race, color, religion, sex, national origin, handicap, sexual orientation, marital status, or familial status.We do deny housing to individuals: when the application is not complete or accurate where there is not sufficient income/resources to pay rent and livewhere there is poor prior tenancy: evictions, violations, damage to rental property, poorly handled move outs, amounts are still owing to landlords or utilities.Criminal activity is at our discretion depending on severity, number of convictions, and how long ago.In your specific case I would deny them for having a prior eviction, unless I could reach the landlord and determine that they complied and have paid amounts owing.  

I'm not judging the indivduals on their race, sex, sexuality or religious beliefs.

The bill that Account Closed is referring to opens that law to sexual assault and stalking, but it is still just a bill and not a law.

Most of the properties aren't zoned for hotel use, the host aren't licensed to run a hotel, the business isn't registered with city/state, tax evasion of course, rapes and sexual assaults, fraud etc.

Here's an article about a case I read about regarding Section 8 not having to be accepted:http://realtytimes.com/todaysheadlines1/item/2224-...Specifically, here are the most pertinent paragraphs relating to Section 8 not being income:The allegation that the Fair Employment and Housing Act was violated centered on the prohibition against housing discrimination on the basis of "race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, or disability of that person."

The word on the street is he took payment in the form of sexual favors.

Ones of the horizon if not already enacted in some areas are sexual orientation, veteran status, and ultimately genetic information.Basically just treat everyone the same.