Also 1 of the dogs is a service dog for a disabled adult so I know I can't descriminate there.

Such regs are usually tageted to those who receive food stamps, disability payments or other social income sources since doing so would basically exclude those receiving entitlements.

If I own a property that has disabled friendly features built in.

PS It sounds like, from your description of her, she very well might have a learning disability, which would up the chances she has a payee. 

You can keep the look and disable it too by blocking it off.

If you pass, then you enter into a section 8 contract.As for saying no pets, you can say that you don't accept pets, but as you probably already know, without citing the sections of the federal (ADA) , California state (FEHA) , and municipal laws (I am sure there are some LAHCID regs on this), I will just say that you cannot legally discriminate against disabled tenants who have service animals by claiming it violates your a no pet policy.  

If this kid is adhd or has any sort of disability and you use that as a reason for eviction you are looking at possible serious discrimination charges.

Also, if the family is employed or has other aid such as social security or disability, the voucher holder will pay a portion of the rent.

Here's my story:I’m 47 years old and am long term disabled.

I managed a building where the electric was constantly being shut off for tenants that couldn't pay,, we'd either find out when the service tech came to block the meter or when we saw a extension cord running under the door to a hallway outlet,, which if we found the maintenance tech was told to unplug and disable the plug by cutting the cord..