@Cody Skiles no idea what your PMC is referring to.S8 does NOT inflate COMPARABLE rents!

If you wanted to do that, you can probably take what you were doing previously and compare it to the City's screening brochure:  https://www.portland.gov/sites/default/files/2020-02/phb-rso-brochure-screening-v8-spreads.pdf?

It was a defining moment of reckoning, a stark realization that I had sacrificed years of my life for a career that seemed to be slipping through my fingers.Yet, amidst the despair, a flicker of resilience ignited within me, fueled by the echoes of past triumphs over adversity.

I think that 25-30% is outrageous unless the company is doing an outstanding job increasing your occupancy rate compared to AirBnB, HomeAway/VRBO and other popular sites for properties in your area.

It’s the similarity (or lack thereof) of the fact pattern in two separate disputes that allows one to conclude that they are distinguishable or not.It’s interesting to compare the Lawler decision to our hypothetical case because the trial court found the buyer had shown he had a valid enforceable contract and therefore was entitled to specific performance.

The tenant guideline is 1/3 the tenant's gross qualifying income, which is subsidized and they may pay for higher rents not to exceed the FMR mean of comparable housing in that MSA.

There is more inventory for value-add compared to some of the other cities.

Real estate already has some pretty good analysis spreadsheets with less variables as compared to the stock market.

Airbnb's dynamic pricing is often laughable compared to what my software/live revenue manager come in at. 

Compare its 70,000 student body to that of Stetson or Rollins with a few thousand and the needs are far less.