Too bad, tenants aren't saying a thing for fear of paying.

There aren't many "short-term, get rich quick" type investment options in SoCal today. 

If you’re looking for short-term cash flow, you might need to explore nearby markets with lower entry costs and higher cash-on-cash returns, even if they aren’t as familiar to you.

From what have been explain to me there are advantages and disadvantages in both situations and they aren't exactly interchangeable.Don't know much more than this. 

This also helps with tax planning so clients aren't blindsided.The tools/software that clients use is as varied as the clients themselves. 

-Higher interest rates and costs for the next property could reduce returns, especially if cash flow projections aren’t realistic.Key ConsiderationsCash Flow vs.

so just because you would not want to live in a specific town for various reasons does not mean they aren't attractive to others and good investment opportunities. 

That is just not realistic in this current market.So in my opinion it's important to expose yourself to a large number of deals, so you can develop an intuitive sense of what's reasonable and what's not (and quickly discard the ones that aren't).And it's true that there is no way to 100% protect from fraud (and not just in passive real estate investments but even in public stocks etc.).

I'm kinda surprised more people aren't talking about it because it's a fairly transformative law, allowing investors to create ADUs as well.

The gurus apparently aren't savvy enough to teach how to avoid trouble.It could end up being like a cowboy fest campfire dinner of beans from the old chuck wagon.