But, you have to ask yourself about the morality of a company that wants to be paid upfront fees to help someone in a financial crisis.You also have to question the 50% success rate.

That's just me and my moral standing.

Now, because a few morally challenged maverick investors took advantage of their mortgage financing and ability to sway an appraisal, it’s extremely difficult to buy a house and sell it quickly to a retail buyer.

So the moral of the story is (RENT)?

I guess the moral is you can screen tenants all you want....but if they bring a chucklehead on the property you still got bs to deal with.This was back when I was in college and was an onsite manager at a 30 unit complex in Missouri.

First of all, none of you are Tony Soprano, and secondly this business requires morals, ethics and integrity.

People forget their morals and the idea of "what goes around comes around"...

It seems like it doesnt matter what city you live in...the news available to that city's inhabitants is always going to be uplifting and attractive...otherwise the morale as a whole would go down and who would invest?

If you look at this from the point of view of morality you're not helping them at all by letting them stay in this property.

However, IMO you have a moral obligation to work with your tenant/buyer and try to get them in shape to refinance at some point, possibly a LOT more involvement than you wanted.Just be careful not to generalize on an area as a "high crime, low income" area.