While the first two are great for inspiration, the last one offers much more image control based on what is called ControlNets, which allows control of the composition and weights of an image.

Tis dollar for dollar reduction should equate to getting me down to the same amount as if I did not have the capital gains. 

The Fed is only proposing 75 basis points in reductions next year IF everything goes according to their plan.

For example:  Reviews are weighted the most by the algorithm. 

Since IB has gotten so many positive remarks here, I may reconsider it, since it is weighted very high by the algorithm. 

The question is—do you have enough weight in your money-raising capacity so the Sponsor would agree to provide you with all that?

They are ranked (using the price-and-rent-growth weighting algorithm) as follows:80003804018021980017800108021280239801048024980226Let’s see the average monthly price growth map again with just the top 10 zip codes:Now let’s look at the average monthly rent growth for the top 10 ranked zip codes.And now let’s look at the rent-price ratios for the top 10 zip codes:Now let’s take a look at the prices for each of these zip codes:So far, 80003 and 80219 look like the best zip codes for buy-and-hold strategies close to the front range (if we ignore Aurora, CO completely).What are your thoughts?

To offset no income 'reduction' from lack of qualified rerirement plan contributions I held a lot of real estate with low land value. 

Do the math: 100 car train, each car 100,000 pounds gross weight each.

No real weight to either.