I felt that was inappropriate.

I feel it's inappropriate to get anymore specifics, because then THAT would be vain/smug.Example, for those that really want to judge or compare or even just converse with others beyond door count to get an understanding of their portfolio...

The exception to that would be health/safety items required to rent/occupy is such as GFCI outlets in appropriate locations. 2.

I think your best option is to have the tenant get a storage unit, so that they can greatly reduce the amount of stuff they're storing at your property.A few things to consider:   1. leases often have sections describing appropriate (and inappropriate) use of the unit.

The record is not terrible, but I'm not a fan of their model because it targets investors for whom these are wholly inappropriate investments.

I have reams of texts and emails of him saying wildly inappropriate and racist ****.

BiggerPockets will remove UGC that we, in our sole discretion, deem inappropriate, or that violates our rules.

I would skip this for sure.Agreed, it's not legal or proper to give out the names or phone numbers of your borrowers without their permission.There's absolutely nothing inappropriate or unseemly about offering up borrowers willing to share their lender experiences with another potential borrower.The private lending landscape is littered with scammers and bad actors.

We need fewer regulations (or at least the correct ones) to incentivize housing construction and more up-zoning in appropriate areas to add density to existing lots.

The fact that your PM stated that it's "inappropriate" to disclose the vendor invoice and the PM markup for overseeing repairs is a huge red flag!