If it's a house I'm selling, I will do anything within my ability (morally, ethically and legally of course) to ensure I get that check in hand! 

I do not come to BP to debate taxes, government, policy, morality, or who is right and who is wrong.

I just thing it is short sighted and morally questionable.

Moral of story is that people, especially vacationers, are going to be picky no matter what.

Until they can solve that moral conundrum I think it stays status quo.

Moral of the story, for an unknown third party seller you may want an attorney to review the contract to make sure you have protections.    

So moral of the story is, don't just assume that because the amount owing is higher than the property is worth that the bank will not be discounting the note at auction.Also, VERY IMPORTANT: understand the risks of buying at auction.

Maybe they are available at the local building department for public view, but I have never seen them online.The moral is: in some markets, the price to acquire is more than replacement cost, or cost to build new.  

The moral of the story is any investor should be extremely careful investing at current climate, as there's a possibility that we will have no growth in the next few years with declined rent growth and fantastic mortgage payment.

To answer your question: Some of them I would live in, others I would not (due to varying factors, location, neighbors, condition, my stage in life)It also sounds like you are wrestling with a morality thing - no problem with that, but this is a business to me personally.