Rather to point out that even with a pretty broad professional and educational experience, I honestly believe Property Management is one of the most difficult professions to master, mainly because it is so broad - you have to know a lot of stuff, about a lot of different stuff, to be a good property manager, such as:People skills - dealing with owners, tenants, contractors, government officials, real estate professionals, etc.Project management skills - timelines, logistics, financingAdministrative skills - property management software, rent collections, leases, contracts, renewals, bills, payment processingConstruction and renovation skills and cost estimatingMarketing and Advertising - if prospective tenants can't find your rental listings and become leads, then you won't last longCRM and Database management - lead capture and workflowDue Diligence - interpreting tenant screenings, background and credit checks, etcTechnology - PM software, electronic lock boxes, real estate apps - probably the toughest on this list to keep up withLegal - landlord/tenant laws, Fair Housing laws, Credit Reporting laws, privacy laws, evictions, etc.I could go on and on.

Even if you go after the seller, there is no guarantee and they did disclose that there was damage to the roof- so you are arguing about the extent of damage (which if was of concern, should have been assessed independently of seller's roofer or interpretation).

They interpret that to mean "I'll be getting your home from you free."

I am looking at some county tax records that show :- Land Appraisal: $7100, Property appraisal: $30300 and Total appraisal: $37400Then below there is a Total Assessment value that is considerably less than the total appraisal, $9350I understand the difference between appraisal and assessment, but I am not sure how to interpret those numbers above for tax calculation purposes.Thanks

I also spoke with a Provo zoning officer that confirmed that interpretation.

But both of them tell a story, and your job is to interpret that story.  

@Cj McDougalRead California Civil code 1954 which regulates landlord entry.Unless you read it and have a different interpretation than me In California: The only legal way for a landlord to enter a property without consent is for an emergency or if the tenant has abandoned the property. 

Mostly at median rents or above where rent is a little more subject to interpretation and there are less comps.

I do see how my wording could be interpreted the way you interpreted it.  

So in the bigger pockets lease it talks about not disturbing the neighbors or being able to hear the noise TV radio after I think it's 8:00 p.m.. could that be interpreted in a way that gives me grounds to get rid of them.