I ask since you could interpret his statement in many ways.

Some folks' interpretation of wholesaling is close on it, take title, then go into the next closing and sell it.

So you'd interpret this as a "bad" deal, whereas I am trying to reason a way to make it into a "good" deal because right now, I am currently renting.Originally posted by @Brent Coombs:@Alex W., if having a mortgage with expenses can be cheaper than what you'd otherwise have to pay in rent ANYWAY - why wouldn't you buy?

@Brian ZitzowWithout further context, I would interpret this as saying the average sale price of all homes that sold/closed in a given month was X and the average list price of all homes in whatever system you're looking at is Y.

If there was any other interpretation we would be tearing out everything in older homes because they do not comply with todays standards. 

They key, as you've alluded to, is how AZ interprets the debt forgiveness.

This is an issue that those who dont work full time in the industry I think often dont get, the severity of the interpretation of Fair Housing Laws in the courts, and as regulated by government agencies.  

I'm trying to learn what kind of information I can get from these sources and how to interpret it.

It is good you are attempting to think in line with the intent of the regulation, but we must remove the mysticism and actually look at the regulation to see what it says before we overly interpret what we think it says. 

For me it filters out people who interpret "credit check" as meaning, "I have money under my mattress"@Eugene Kemp Michael S.