In summary, for now, agreements in court regarding future rent payments will be denied by the courts: "One huge change that has happened in the past few months relates to a NH Supreme court case this year.

It is undisputed that the [Rental Dwelling Code] affords no warrant procedure or other mechanism for precompliance review . . . the owners and/or tenants of rental properties in Portsmouth are thus faced with the choice of consenting to the warrantless inspection or facing criminal charges, a result the Supreme Court has expressly disavowed under the Fourth Amendment.”

Under a 2010 Supreme Judicial Court ruling, all property owners (rental or owner occupied) can be held liable for failing to remove snow and ice from their property.

I believe if this went up to the US Supreme Court, anti wholesaling laws would not hold water for a second. 

I also found a US Supreme Court decision (Eliason v.

After 1980 and a Supreme Court ruling, due on sale became the standard.  

Ego and bravado reign supreme, and they make lots of mistakes.

Jerry - I looked into tenancy by the entirety (had never heard of it before) and found this: In 1890, the Minnesota Supreme Court identified that the tenancy by the entirety form of real property title ownership had been abolished in Minnesota,... so i'm guessing it's not even an option?

(Tenant exaggerating by saying 3rd time)Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ensured that Tenants have the Right to a decent place to liveThis guarantee to decent rental housing is called the Implied Warranty of Habitability.The Tenant is also Protected against Discrimination & Acts of retaliation for reporting Repairs /ViolationsYour Contractor suggested Repairing & Remediating Mold Concern Saturday 6th July this date will not work .NOTE: No commitment to make any repairs received by the Landlord (HE IS LYING) Today ABC CO.

I currently reign Supreme in Biddeford.Hello Tyler!