I didn't try to argue with him or further explore the validity of his claims.Few people look at as many on-market investment properties each week in Utah as me, and so I feel very confident in saying that FIG's pro-forma returns look totally awesome for Utah's investment climate.  

Your home IS in a location that could make it a good STR/MTR given proximity to attractions and it's in beautiful shape so I don't think the operator is pulling the interest/opportunity out of their a**.Attorneys would probably argue with me, but if their LLC is going to rent it, I would still get the individual on the lease or at least a co-signor guarantor agreement so that you have the EIN and SSN for purposes of evictions and collections. 

@Ember MeadowsIn the buyer section of the contract, I write ABC Fund, LLC &/or assignsWhen it comes to "opening title" I then take the contract to the title company that I wrote into the contract with the earnest money check made out to them.

The owner spent a long time arguing over this requirement because he was planning to do the groundwork himself with his own excavator/bulldozer and said the cost was prohibitive for poles this tall.

Nobody can argue that.

I argue the latter is wrong-- it'll actually correct harsher.

In our case, we make purchase money loans toward local flips, and I argue that deferred payments make our loans safer.

Arguing over the internet is like nuclear war.

Landlords worry that the security deposits allowed under the bill will not be sufficient to cover these damages.The presence of pets can lead to higher maintenance costs due to wear and tear, noise complaints, and the need for more frequent and thorough cleaning.Financial Implications: The bill prohibits landlords from charging additional rent or security deposits specifically for pets, which landlords argue is necessary to offset the increased risk and maintenance costs associated with allowing pets.Landlords may need to increase their liability insurance coverage to protect against potential issues arising from having pets on the property, which could lead to higher insurance premiums.Key Provisions of AB 2216No Blanket Pet Bans: Landlords can’t have blanket bans on common household pets without valid reasons.No Extra Charges: Landlords can’t charge extra rent or security deposits for pets.Documentation Requirement: Landlords must provide written documentation if they restrict pets for health or safety reasons.Pet Liability Insurance: The bill might require tenants with pets to have pet liability insurance.As always, I’m here to discuss how this might impact us as property managers and landlords.

Plus some attorneys will argue the extension is not valid or if you are doing an extension to a lease that is weak to begin with it just doesn't help.Our policy is a new lease every renewal.