Low-density communities don't want to see higher density developments because it might bring "undesirables".

So while I agree with you about using the increase to drive out undesirable tenants.

No we can not simply replace undesirable/bad tenants in a nanny state.Here is another example of Ontario codes- Ontario human rights- landlords may not use a income scale to determine a applicants ability to pay.

Yes, the crime rate is higher than other areas, the schools are not as funded, and there are many other issues that might make these areas "undesirable" for some.

“I’d say it was two or three pounds full,” my fiancé replies.Sure got his attention.

Yes, you can find cheaper houses but they are in very undesirable neighborhoods.

That house was 600 dollars installed with a 10 pound pad and 10 year warranted carpet.

I wont go into details but several hundred pounds of weed and back door blown open by the law and off to prison they went.

If you have a great deal with tons of demand you can start dictating the terms and tell a lender/partner to pound sand because they are out of line from the other deals you have. 

Rule breakers don't feel comfortable renting from us and either don't apply or move on.We also have a strict "no smoking" policy, which doesn't allow smoking anywhere on the premises, and that alone weeds out many undesirable people and helps preserve the property.