data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dba6/0dba6ec36b0198f8f27364510ad5875487b26e09" alt=""
24 September 2013 | 20 replies
Multi-Family can mean more than a single family but is not really a distinction of where commercial and residential lines are drawn.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b46b/7b46b578404ca4e63d0e10b9bce8242499e3bc90" alt=""
7 January 2020 | 14 replies
@Jaron Walling Perhaps the distinction to be made is between hard money/private money and to which @Angelica M Garzon is speaking.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83e9e/83e9e23433e72c900715539a2b936df5c9b391c4" alt=""
10 June 2020 | 15 replies
There are two critical distinctions with the assets that you control or at least own a major piece of:1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2783/e2783ffebf1e169d23f8294ee0de38b687efda13" alt=""
24 April 2020 | 80 replies
(The distinction is someone can say they don't have any pets....but guess what....they may have a "service animal").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb05a/eb05aa5d3bedf3d0ce115d8b9bdf2f99f7c19b46" alt=""
24 March 2011 | 37 replies
So, a distinction should at least be understood that when a lender accepts payments from a buyer under an installment purchase agreement, that such acceptance is not a loan assumption per se, it is simply allowing a third party to make payments in the name of or for the benefit of the borrower but the loan remains in the original borrower's name, fully liable and without any requirement made by the lender to collect anything from that third party.So, as a new investor, when you walk into a bank and put your business plan on the loan officer's desk, look him in the eye and say, "I have a deal and I would like to assume theseller's loan" you'll at least know how silly you sound to the loan officer, what it is you are actually asking the bank to do!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/867ab/867ab47a67f493a7b67d91aa4ab97c31067aae64" alt=""
11 October 2017 | 1 reply
What is Distinct About Sellers in these Areas, should anything be handled differently/specifically?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96c8e/96c8e8b8d06bdf1ab4ab24e7c992a630fbf17e6f" alt=""
29 December 2015 | 81 replies
It gives it a very distinct ashtray smell and isn't easy to get rid of.Again, nothing wrong with the people.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b43ee/b43ee486e927991d41aeb39ad23b015536dcc107" alt=""
24 May 2017 | 7 replies
I'm not knowledgeable enough to say that's right or wrong, but it is a distinct deviation from the very general 70% rule of thumb.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8bc0/e8bc0527b77c3855d83bfde7f222d41c25762d06" alt=""
7 October 2022 | 229 replies
Again, the documents signed clearly spell out the remedy for violating the due on sale clause The clear proof that Sub2 is not fraud lies in the fact that many title companies provide title insurance for Sub2 transactions which would not be offered in a fraudulent situation Greg I agree with you .. you have two distinct transactions.. you have the origination of the original mortgage.. then you have a simple transfer of title sub too that mortgage..