Builder is  threatening that he would sell the house to someone else as he is not happy with the loan officer!!

At this point i am going to see how it all plays out, if the threatened lawsuits come to fruition and as stated earlier, even though my properties are currently excluded from this, i am going to have them tested and abated if need be just because its the right thing to do.

I have a tenant who is threatening to withhold next month's rent.  

Your contract should state that your buying the house in the condition it was when you initially offered, if it deteriorates or threatens to let them know to fix it or get a contractor to remediate the problem while it's dragging out.

Not normal - threatening to sue me if I kicked him out as he is on disability and I am causing him distress, and threatening to have the tenants who complain to talk to him (probably plan on beating them up or something).

Whatever you say/threaten, it is imperative that you follow through with it.If it sounds like paying rent on time is going to be an issue for the foreseeable future, you may want to shift the conversation about having them vacate and getting someone in there who is willing and able to pay rent on time.  

You can threaten legal action, but your probably only going to get reimbursed for your expenses and then comes the challenge of collecting on it.

He threatened a lawsuit.When I look through the list of charges, I am a little disturbed.$100 to replace the furnace filters$200 for gutter cleaning$150 to change the locks$50 Move out inspection fee$200 Cleaning fee$150 Floor cleaningThe list goes on.

One of his rental homes flooded, and she threatened to sue him if he set foot on the property.I just assumed that standard landlord law gave him the right to enter a property to do emergency repairs or damage mitigation, but this lady is really freaking out and says she has a friend who is a lawyer who swears up and down he cannot enter the property without her permission.Any words of wisdom?

However, this new buyer is threatening to get attorneys involved because he seems to think that this is not a encroachment granted in perpetuity.I think my folks are in the clear on this due to the nature of the language in the agreement but the last thing I want to have happen is get lawyers involved and have them have to pay to move the tank since, technically speaking, they are in the wrong.Don't have any experience/advice in this matter?