![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2649181/small_1716162122-avatar-owenm53.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
29 December 2024 | 30 replies
@James Wise has a great video explaining this: As an investor focused agent with boots-on-the-ground here in Cleveland- I would love to help you find and purchase a solid property!
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2947328/small_1707901540-avatar-mattw651.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
24 December 2024 | 17 replies
Just let the tenants know why you are doing it and explain they will be renewed (if you like them) no problem.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/57139/small_1660933775-avatar-1marcus.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
14 February 2025 | 161 replies
This would be the proper argument for explaining why you should not invest in RE for primarily, but really only, cash flow.It's a store of value against the dollar, and utility for the people.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2420642/small_1736641950-avatar-chriso250.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
18 December 2024 | 13 replies
I also recommend explaining what the penalty will be if she's not out as scheduled.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1749253/small_1621515243-avatar-keithr138.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
24 December 2024 | 9 replies
@Keith RichardsonMake sure the accountant explains your total compliance costs for the varying setups as well.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2780128/small_1696621716-avatar-nataliap33.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
31 December 2024 | 57 replies
Having said that, the best course of action is to tell the tenant what day and time the appointment is and explain if she wants to be there for it that's fine, if she can't be there, that is fine too, the workers will be entering her property without her being there.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/156530/small_1694551673-avatar-matthewp.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
22 December 2024 | 23 replies
Most inspectors will know that properties only need to meet whatever the code was when they were built, not current code and they usually explain that properly IME.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2930740/small_1706245822-avatar-johnc2170.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 December 2024 | 10 replies
That's the only solution and it doesn't require fifteen paragraphs to explain or justify.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2888429/small_1701702884-avatar-laurenc229.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
18 December 2024 | 13 replies
So better to put any fears they have to rest and explain the situation.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2443036/small_1696600925-avatar-eyalg7.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
14 January 2025 | 23 replies
Please explain how you come to this emphatic conclusion.The Due on Sale clause does not contain a phrase to that effect.Case law does not support your comment.It is more properly stated that "you can not hide the fact with intent to deceive".In law, there is a significant difference between intentionally being deceitful (fraud) and buying properties using creative finance using escrow and properly reporting the transaction.