My primary method to analyze deals just on the surface is to use the 1% Rule (Rent/Price >= 0.1). 

Biggerpockets Calculators and analyzing enough deals that way led me to go by the 1.5% rule. Rents

If you are a good landlord, the costs to turn an MTM unit are no more than a longer term contract, and often less overall because the time tested Golden Rule really works. 

After going through the tutorial, 2% rule really doesn't apply to the properties in CA.

I am having a bit of trouble finding much relevance for applying the 50% Rule to SFH...especially if the property is rehabbed with very little chance there will be maintenance costs...and if the tenant pays utilities....

Initial Investment:  Money down + rehab estimate + closing costsCash flow/Assets: 50% Rule: 50% of rent will go to expenses not including the P.I.1-2% Rule: Rent should be 1-2% of purchase costCAP Rate: 5-10%?

I have heard of the 1% Rule (rent to purchase value), but not the 2% rule.

Monthly Rent (using Rentometer) $ 5,094.00 1% Rule (Rent should be 1% of Purchase + Rehab) $ 3,650.00 Does this PASS the 1% Rule?

I guess I just assumed nothing local could be found that would hit the 1%rule. Really

The broker is responsible for ensuring all the agents under them obide by the laws, rulers, and code of ethics, depending on what associations they have.