Always better to err on the side of caution when considering an offer & crunching #'s though ;)

The Starker exchange rule (I see I erroneously referred to it as Stryker like the healthcare company above) gives you some leeway on timing, though, so it may be less difficult than it looks. 

I personally like to err on the conservative side so doing a proper securities exemption along with an offering circular is probably prudent, but you may not be able to afford it with your size deal.  

They typically err on the side of the Tenant. 

For this reason you might want to assume that it will be a single tenant occupying the property for your calculations, to err on the conservative side.

@Aman, I always err on the side of more is always better.

I will have to double check if we have a guarantor clause but it sounds like it would make more sense to err on the side of caution and have the cosigner sign the renewal as well.Once again, this forum is an amazing resource. 

I have their science down to a T so my video contained nothing erroneous about it. 

I have seen applicants erroneously have evictions on their credit due to small repairs to a dwelling that were repaired by the tenant prior to move-out.

As a new developer in DC, I guess I have to err on the side of Eric and Arthur until I start building relationships and try to bring costs down, but I absolutely see Russell's and Mark's point of keeping the costs low to increase the profit margins, but I feel like that will come with more rehabs and relationships.