
21 August 2009 | 22 replies
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;To borrow money on the credit of the United States;To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States;To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States;To establish post offices and post roads;To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court;To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;To provide and maintain a navy;To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;--AndTo make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

28 August 2009 | 17 replies
There was a Supreme Court case back in 1973 (Roe v Wade) where the court determined that the mother has the ultimate right to choose.

8 September 2009 | 1 reply
This is a SUPREME fraud for which we "little people" will pay for decades, not just years.

12 September 2009 | 30 replies
,what did everything start from,where did that come from,nobody on planet earth can answer that,it has to start from thatThere are a lot of questions we can't answer, but that doesn't mean there is a supreme being. 3000 years ago, people couldn't explain why the Sun rose everyday, so they attributed it to a god.

3 November 2009 | 66 replies
In my opinion, the Supreme Court should never have ruled that the income tax is not a "taking" that requires just compensation.

24 July 2011 | 7 replies
Owens Corning 25-Year Supreme Desert Tan 3-Tab Asphalt Roofing Shingles I also wonder if new roof is needed or not if the roof is 15 years old, and seeing it's aging on the edge of the roof.

15 December 2016 | 21 replies
The Supreme Court in our state recently interpreted to include even situations where the seller was not in distress.

29 September 2015 | 0 replies
In summary, for now, agreements in court regarding future rent payments will be denied by the courts: "One huge change that has happened in the past few months relates to a NH Supreme court case this year.

1 November 2015 | 3 replies
It is undisputed that the [Rental Dwelling Code] affords no warrant procedure or other mechanism for precompliance review . . . the owners and/or tenants of rental properties in Portsmouth are thus faced with the choice of consenting to the warrantless inspection or facing criminal charges, a result the Supreme Court has expressly disavowed under the Fourth Amendment.”

10 January 2019 | 14 replies
Under a 2010 Supreme Judicial Court ruling, all property owners (rental or owner occupied) can be held liable for failing to remove snow and ice from their property.