If there's a hole, it may be a red flag.b) sensitivity analysis: I examine all the assumptions, and make sure I can live with the worst case scenarios.c) "Stall and see": if they are getting money over multiple years, and there is no penalty for investing later, I would usually wait so I get some real performance data, versus having to look at theoretical pro forma information.d) Recession stress test: I will not invest in anything, until I subject it to recession level stress and see if I can live with the result.

This market is very important as usually very sensitive to appreciation/depreciation.Also, there are more intermediate data that show that we may not even recession at all.

Really enjoying reading your thread interesting opinions, and thoughtful comments. yes, spillover effect.Both real estate and tech sector is extremely sensitive to cheap money policy.

Interesting how sensitive al lot of the CA investors are.  

San Franciso is going to be ultra sensitive to interest rates as well.  

To sign up with them requires both myself and tenant submit sensitive information like SSN/TIN and bank/routing.  

Otherwise, as a data holder, via landlord business, you now become responsible for PII data which can open risk to identify theft liability or other issues related to handling PII sensitive data.

Most have red-lined the subdivision where the house is located as "Karst Sensitive", and won't insure at all... or won't cover sinkholes if they do.For what it is worth, I bought seven from this auction company last month, all from the same "owner/developer", and the tenants have mostly been good ones.  

Part of it is the older building but some of it could be the sensitivity of certain tenants to noise.

Lenders are very fearful of the prospect of foreclosing on a church.There are groups that lend on churches but many are geographically sensitive, and there needs to be some source of repayment.