
28 July 2009 | 6 replies
:cool: A view at the numbers…Democrat Health “Reform†By the NumbersJuly 20, 2009—UPDATEDHere is a compiled a list of important numbers relevant to the House Democrats’ 1,018-page “America’s Affordable Health Choices Act:â€114 million—Number of individuals who could lose their current coverage under the bill, according to non-partisan actuaries at the Lewin Group4.7 million—Number of jobs that could be lost as a result of taxes on businesses that cannot afford to provide health insurance coverage, according to a model developed by Council of Economic Advisors Chair Christina Romer$818 billion—Total new taxes on individuals who cannot afford health coverage, and employers who cannot afford to provide coverage that meet federal bureaucrats’ standards$1.28 trillion—New federal spending in the next ten years, according to a Congressional Budget Office score of selected elements of the bill.6%—Percentage of all that new spending occurring in the bill’s first three years—representing a debt and tax “time bomb†in the program’s later years that will explode for future generations$88,200—Definition of “low-income†family of four for purposes of health insurance subsidies33—Entitlement programs the bill creates, expands, or extends—an increase from an earlier draft53—Additional offices, bureaus, commissions, programs, and bureaucracies the bill creates over and above the entitlement expansions—also an increase from the discussion draft1,683—Uses of the word “shall,†representing new duties for bureaucrats and mandates on individuals, businesses, and States—and an increase of 306 mandates from the discussion draft$10 billion—Minimum loss sustained by taxpayers every year due to Medicare fraud; the government-run health plan does not reform the ineffective anti-fraud statutes and procedures that have kept Medicare on the Government Accountability Office’s list of high-risk programs for two decadesZero—Prohibitions on government programs like Medicare and Medicaid from using cost-effectiveness research to impose delays to or denials for access to life-saving treatments2017—Year Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund will be exhausted—a date unchanged by the bill, which re-directs savings from Medicare to fund new entitlements for younger Americans$2,500—Promised savings for each American family from health reform, according to then-Senator Obama’s campaign pledge—savings which the Congressional Budget Office has confirmed will not materialize, as the bill will not slow the growth of health care costs

12 October 2009 | 61 replies
Joe,I'm having fun with one of the most historically stupid comments ever to be made....made by none other than Rosie O'Donnell.Truth be told, I can show you how to melt steel in a campfire through proper redirection of the wind.Tim

22 December 2015 | 14 replies
Hillman tried this method and won the case to the extent that it did not improve his financial position, but the tax court disallowed this income conversion method to the extent that it lowered Hillman's tax liability. http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-4th-circuit/1214577....Simply redirecting income to a different type of entity has no bearing on the economic substance of the transaction.

1 October 2015 | 7 replies
The admins are pretty good about redirecting posts if you put them in the incorrect places.

6 June 2019 | 20 replies
Yes I am pre-qualified, I actually almost closed on a single family home but I'm redirecting to a duplex/multi-family.

10 July 2020 | 18 replies
Do all of the responses redirect back to Tellus?

24 June 2019 | 4 replies
If you have slop behind it, that's from where most of the water is coming into your backyard - that wall should "capture" it and redirect it on the sides, and eventually, further out along the sides of your house following the natural ground slope (see pictures below).The backyard seems flat - one way or another you'll have to find a way to slope it and move water along.Just my 2¢.

16 July 2019 | 1 reply
Yes, you will get the deduction on your personal return, but you cannot think this as if you redirecting the gain to HSA and avoiding the taxes.

10 July 2020 | 9 replies
Or re-direct me to the previous posts regarding this topic?
20 July 2020 | 6 replies
Maybe you would want to look at some kind of drainage system around your house to redirect the water when it comes down.