His information is faulty, his approach is to "overleverage", "zero down" and in my opinion the information he leaves out is either lack of experience on his part or intentional deception, neither of which I am willing to be associated with.He leaves out very important information, like what my buddy recently posted at Using Subject To, to Get "Free" Properties - A Quick Guidelinehttps://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/311/topics/1188416-usin...We teach even the downside of Subject To and how to avoid the pitfalls.

Titan was able to track the funds to verify that the second attempt did in fact go through (with no need to try for a third time!)

A few pictures should verify if there were stains.

However the property has a freeway behind it and hence no rear neighbors /more privacy.What do you want to to?

Verifying last 2 years of rental history very important!

Still, based on all the non-verifiable hyperbole used in his presentation, I passed.

Also these deals are not one out of 100 they are the last 3 i have closed on to keep, you can verify on the county site.

Could not verify business address, when we spoke to one of the "agents" he said they were in Florida, but address showed Delaware. 

Ask for specific referencs of STR they are managing in the area and make sure to verify any information given.

On Page 134, he lists the following when analyzing a deal:Sales Price: $132,490.00Sales Expenses: $17,000.00Loan Balance: $55,004.72Total Invested Capital: $35,950.00Profit: $24,535.28I agree with his thought process here when he calculates net profit, but I'm trying to verify the net profit by adding up all the sources of income over the past five years in his example by doing the following:Appreciation over five years=$12,490 (see chart on Page 133).Cash flow ($297.73x12x5)=$17,863.80 over five years.Loan paydown: ($60,000-55,004.72)=$4,995.28 over five years.Sales Expenses are still $17,000.Doing the math, profit= $12,490+$17,863.80+$4,995.28-$17,000=$18,349.08There is a $6,186.20 difference from the net profit he calculates.My question is: Is this $6,186.20 difference due to the forced appreciation gained in the property from the rehab he does in this example?