I wouldn't want that slim of margins in North Sac, but I'd consider it in Oak Park.

And even if many of them are looking with the best of intentions, in the end if they've yet to take down a commercial deal, the odds of them doing their first with that particular broker are slim. 

I am not sure there are many areas where you can command $2,000 a month in rent and in those areas I would assume the chances of getting a house for $100,000 would be slim at best.

If that's the case you may get them to drop the value to avoid counter claims, in this case, with an attorney as the gatekeeper as Rick mentioned, your chance is slim and none I'd guess at attacking them.Every property that someone wants to sell is not necessarily a deal and you can't make them a deal by pulling rabbits of your hat.

I'm not an attorney and this is not legal advice, but from my experience and countless talks with attorneys on similiar issues, the chance of you getting a home free and clear is likely very very slim to none. 

Short of the zombie apocalypse, I think the odds are slim to none that prices will go down much.

Sometimes white lies when negotiating are okay such as "Oh this one is gonna be slim for me" or things like that. 

Like Zach said, there are plenty of multifamily homes in the city of Phoenix and even Glendale.East valley (chandler, tempe, gilbert) are slim due to the year the citys were developed and their focus on planned communites. 

there are companies in Oregon and Washington that do this.. you need 20% of your own cash up front and of course the bids out this way start at 200k generally and go to millions.so 40k in cash then they charge you a fee for winning the bid then they charge you hard money rates.end of the day.. slim margins for you the flipper and the HML kills it..

@Chris MarshallLike the others, this seems very slim. have you analyzed the numbers on the buildings individually?