![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/724195/small_1695119797-avatar-max44121.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
22 October 2018 | 16 replies
"I would still put them above choice 3"Is that because of the 2 year lease, if so you may be disappointed and should disregard the lease offer in considering their desirability.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/268455/small_1621437771-avatar-nirbhee.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
12 September 2015 | 7 replies
The courts in Florida have held that a single member LLC is a disregarded entity.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1815703/small_1621515813-avatar-clarkstoragellc.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
28 July 2022 | 0 replies
Please disregard the size as it will get adjusted as I develop our financial numbers and the engineer helps me layout the property.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2470538/small_1666202109-avatar-josea469.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
20 October 2022 | 26 replies
What I am saying is to not disregard FHA because your lender is telling you to and is convincing you that your offer won't get accepted because of it.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/233232/small_1621435033-avatar-savvyone.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 August 2022 | 108 replies
Depending on how the Canadian investors are procured, usually Canadian securities laws specifically are disregarded because if you review NAASA, there is cooperation between the US and Canada.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/46590/small_1621408788-avatar-ss3966.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
30 January 2015 | 8 replies
It is an intentional disregard of the other neighbors safety and well-being.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/164319/small_1621420587-avatar-realestate18464.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 January 2017 | 54 replies
Currently makes no sense to me but maybe there are actually approaches to disregard the figures from line 18 of Schedule E for calculating income for purposes of DTI.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/107685/small_1695255841-avatar-mynewname.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
10 August 2018 | 10 replies
Please disregard what Aaron said...it's just not true that if lead paint is covered with layers of other paint...it doesn't need to be abated.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/546/small_1621345490-avatar-timwieneke.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
8 July 2009 | 52 replies
Originally posted by Tim Wieneke: Seeing as 72% of greenhouse gas is water vapor and 80% of the earth's surface is water, I see how this plan is completely conceivable and logical, rather than some cooked up piece of bullsh-- legislation intended to pay off friends for political favors.Unfortunately, the fact that the average person is illiterate with respect to basic science makes this an even more difficult problem to solve...even disregarding the politics...Basic science lesson...The goal isn't to drastically reduce the amount of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere (if we wanted to do that, we'd have to get rid of the clouds first, as they are the major greenhouse culprit)...in fact, we need most of the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere to survive (it's one of the major differentiators of our planet).The actual goal is to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere by a small percentage of the total.By reducing just a small percentage the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, we can (in theory) reduce man-made/precipitated global warming.And, the way to reduce greenhouse gases by a small percentage is to reduce the man-made emissions via manufacturing by a large percentage.Once you understand the science, you realize that -- from a scientific standpoint -- it's quite conceivable.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/64783/small_1621413571-avatar-tbodley.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
27 November 2013 | 40 replies
Bill Gulley Disregard that statement about mentioning the bridge loan to the Realtor.