Without getting too far in to murky details, what I am saying is I belive most RMLO's in the market helping with SF in any form are probably pretty uniformed about the ramifications of their actions and Sellers are trying to use them as circumvention to the rules, which most often does not work in the eyes of the law. 

If the Seller's attorney is inept and screwed up any of the very specific, tedious, administrative details required during the 45-day barment period, it's a better than good chance the judge hearing the case won't grant the motion that would pave the path to an insurable title.  

The appraiser is required to analyzed the purchase agreement per most lender's request and more importantly per the USPAP (Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice).

I would think a motion to the court to sell home would take about the same amount of time and cost less.

An early reply said buyer can make late payments with NO effect on the contract.Buyer has made every payment so far, though some have been late.Kentucky law states the uniform landlord-tenant rules do not apply to our situation.

I sometimes just tell my prospective tenants, "The motion sensor lights, bars, etc. are probably not necessary.

After going through all the motions with a local bank, we were offered a max of $75k, which came as a bit of a surprise considering the property is worth $350k with no debt.

Which you've already set in motion by posting on here.Best of luck!

One of the forms is a "Uniform Borrower Assistance Form".

I am prepared to discuss my  broker and the marketing plan but that has already been put into motion so nothing new there to discuss really.