Now suppose going along with the above, the borrower had a $375,000 mortgage (which they DID) on the property at an interest rate of 3.25%.

The Professor mentioned that it was 'supposed' to move one foot per year to relieve pressure.

They are NOT supposed to and have systems and SOP not to, but it can be pushed through manually.

Two different handyman have already went out there and supposedly fixed what they considered to be the cause of the leak in the past.

And, you cannot change the property characteristics later.For example, suppose you bought a one-bedroom condo in Las Vegas because it was inexpensive.

Does anyone know what the landlord is supposed to do when construction will be occurring on the premises? 

I suppose I'm thinking of the increase in monthly cashflow getting rent and not having a mortgage to pay...

One was awesome refer stocked ( even though supposedly its illegal to do so) bacon eggs you name it..

ya the one I just mentioned to Jay Hurst was a guy who supposedly had off shore money and would get us a large line just needed to give them 500k.. big dog and pony show at wall st lawyer etc.. they even had shills for references that we called and again just did not pass the sniff test..

they’re supposed to have 100% moneyback guarantee.