It might be prudent for you to figure in a monetary or other compensatory allowance for yourself since you wish to assume this risk if you choose to leave the asset vulnerable.    

@Charito Mattson thanks for being vulnerable and sharing your experience.  

We would rather sell It at a deep discount and build capital than a vulnerable portfolio. 

I get that America has some signs of economic health and strength, but I also see some vulnerabilities.

And with revenue-generating websites, while a hell of a lot more stable, it's still vulnerable to stiff competition and changing trends.

There are those flights that end in flames and debris but the actual percentage is very small.

I like cash flow, because it is allowing me to grow (or pay bills), but equity helps me to sleep at night knowing I am not as vulnerable to changes in market rent.

You can really be vulnerable when all the new info and promises start flying around.

We also liked being able to turnover one unit at a time, without leaving the property empty and vulnerable.

In fact, in his book, he suggests (and I agree) that one is most vulnerable with few properties, because cash flow from other properties cannot serve to soften the blow of large expenses on one property (again, going back to the idea of an average cost).So, in other words, in infinite time (or over infinite properties) he is estimating operating expenses will cost around 50% of gross rents.